Help us include pricing data
April 05, 2013
At DocSpot, our mission is to connect people with the right health care by helping them navigate publicly available information. We believe the first step of that mission is to help connect people with an appropriate medical provider, and we look forward to helping people navigate other aspects of their care as the opportunities arise. We are just at the start of that mission, so we hope you will come back often to see how things are developing.
An underlying philosophy of our work is that right care means different things to different people. We also recognize that doctors are multidimensional people. So, instead of trying to determine which doctors are "better" than others, we offer a variety of filter options that individuals can apply to more quickly discover providers that fit their needs.
April 05, 2013
We've been interested in incorporating pricing data for some time. To help underwrite the costs of gathering this data, we launched a crowd funding campaign this week. You can read more of the details about the proposed project.
An efficient marketplace will include transparency into both cost and quality. Health care has been notorious in how opaque the industry is on both counts. Slowly, pricing information is trickling out to the public sphere, and we would like to make it searchable. If you would like to help increase price transparency in health care, please support our project.
March 29, 2013
Much of this week went into implementing various user interface refinements to address issues that surfaced in our user testing. The biggest change is that we're experimenting with a new page layout on the search results page. We've tried to tighten up the filter panel and we changed an ad format so that the actual search results will be visible higher on the page. The page now also makes better use of the browser width. If the browser window expands, content expands with it. We also tried to visually differentiate the tabs so that users will have an easier time recognizing that additional content can be accessed (an issue that arose during user testing). There have been a number of other changes as well.
Over the next two weeks, we hope to conduct additional user testing to make sure that things didn't get worse and to get a better sense of what other problems might exist. If you'd like to participate, please let us know.
March 22, 2013
We interviewed some potential users this week to get their feedback on our new user interface. Overall, the results were encouraging. For example, we achieved our main goal of making the search filters more discoverable. People also commented on how much cleaner the new interface looks. We also learned a lot. In our zeal to make the search filters more discoverable, for example, we ended up pushing the search results further down. On small screens, people can't even see the first pair of doctors without scrolling down. Some people liked how the map takes up as much space as it does, and some others didn't care for it so much.
We'll continue to refine the user interface and seek feedback, so don't be too surprised if you see the page layouts changing. If you have thoughts, please let us know.
March 16, 2013
Some of the work that we do is directly visible to the users of our website. A lot of our work is not easily visible to users, such as improving our data quality. And some of our work falls into yet another category -- work to help search engines make better sense of our site. This week, we worked on adding structured data to our website so that search engines can more easily interpret the data that is presented.
Most of the work is hidden to the user and involves adding tags to tell search engines what the data means. In turn, users might have an easier time finding what they're looking for when they use one of the large search engines.
March 08, 2013
In a world increasingly dominated by social media, doctors are becoming more concerned about managing their online reputations. Some doctors have even resorted to making their patients sign a gag order before treatment. Despite all the controversy, medical professionals need not fear online reviews: sites like Yahoo! Local and Insider Pages show that the majority of patients rate their doctors 5 out of 5.
At DocSpot, we help patients search across hundreds of different websites to find a doctor who meets their individual needs (for example if they need a primary care doctor who specializes in managing diabetes, or an experienced psychiatrist who accepts Aetna). Occasionally, we'll get providers writing in to have their profiles hidden from public view solely because they never want to be rated. Their concerns piqued our curiosity about the review ecosystem, prompting us to ask, "Are online reviews really that negative?" After analyzing about a quarter million reviews, we found that, despite their bad rap, the majority of online patient reviews are favorable towards their doctors. You can see the detailed results in this infographic. Below are some of the most interesting highlights.
Sixty-five percent of the reviews that we analyzed gave the health care professional the highest rating possible, and 3 out of 4 reviews rated the doctor positively (either a 4 or 5 on a 5 point scale). This finding is surprising since the common wisdom is that only the truly irate bother to fill out online reviews, followed by the sliver of ecstatically pleased customers. Rather than asking patients to sign a gag order, perhaps doctors should be asking their patients to fill out online reviews -- chances are, they'll get top marks.
Our analysis delved further into the content of the reviews. It turns out that it's not all about the medical outcomes: the physician's staff and the office each warranted a mention in over 20% of the reviews. Unsurprisingly, people commonly complained about rudeness, billing hassles, and long wait times. Regardless of how much people value medical expertise, customer service is still important.
By examining recurring phrases in the reviews and correlating the data with specialties, we were able to make some other interesting observations. Cardiologists, for example, were repeatedly credited for saving their patients' lives and oncologists were frequently described as compassionate. Chiropractors, for all the flak that they get from physicians, received the highest average rating (4.61 out of 5) of all health care specialists, while endocrinologists got the lowest rating (a mildly positive 3.56 out of 5).
Despite the glacial pace at which the health care industry can seem to adopt technology (are we really just now talking about cloud-based electronic health records?), online patient reviews are a mainstay of how patients select which doctors to go to -- one out of four Americans turn to the internet for physician quality information. While online reviews can either be positive or negative for any individual doctor, our analysis shows that most online patient reviews are favorable. A health care provider's business is likely to benefit from cultivating patient reviews rather than ignoring or suppressing them.
Footnote: Yes, there have been other studies showing that online reviews tend to be positive. Here's one that examined 4,999 reviews, and here's another that examined 190 reviews. We wanted a broader survey, so we analyzed 248,978 reviews.